Restricting Air travel is the only way to restrict air pollution. Do you agree?



In the contemporary world, air pollution becomes an ineluctable and intractable issue. Reliable and easily applicable way to control the air contamination is to limit air traffic, but inadequate to control the treacherous increasing impurities in the air. Therefore, I disagree with the topic. However, artificial carbon dioxide absorbing plants, usage of low carbon chain fuel and by controlling expelling of harmful i air pollution from industries.

To begin with, arrival of sophisticated technology in the immediate world enables manufacturers to design flying objects in such a manner that reduce the ejection of deleterious and injurious gases at the nominal level. Furthermore, limiting the air traffic could not exhibits desiring outcomes, recently engineering magazine in South America published that air filters inside the plane expel around 3% of the environmentally unfriendly gases. Moreover, air transportation is the most reliable transport system among all. Presently, goods are transported through air transportation, confining air transportation activities and reduction in flying hours could lead towards enormous financial losses for a  courier industry.

Secondly,the aviation business is at a summit, expansion of the tourist industry propels private investor to invest an extensive amount of monetary assets in the field of aviation, hence hindering and obstructing the usual schedule could cause unacceptable and unimpressive results. Similarly, tourist industry may have a negative impact and tourists feel uncomfortable due to unavailability of flights. For example, flights in Canada were reduced in last winter due to bad weather, but that resulted in  high cost of flight tickets.

To sum up, downsizing of air traffic movement is not a pragmatic decision, but any limitations on such spectacular and phenomenal mode of transportation could deteriorate country frugality .

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities. To what extent do you agree?

Industries must contribute in promoting local traditions and sports activities by conducting games and public events.In fact, expressing support for local society could bring comprehensive benefits to business groups,therefore, I agree that   gigantic firms must arrange fitness and cultural promoting campaigns. To begin with,   sports is a platform that develop the waves of   jubilation in an individuals and reunite haphazardly relations,in addition, arrangement of sport projects will boost the healthy environment in the society and also become the source of motivation .Furthermore, physical fitness is mandatory for the optimum mental health, actually, physical movements improve the blood flow ,excretes deleterious partials from a person body through the process of sweating.Consequently, prevents the non oxygenated bloods to get further corrupted with harmful viruses. For instance, in events employee families meet with each other, contacts exchange and pleasant conversation led
Read more

Some People think that the Government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Undoubtedly,the arts depict nation culture, traditions, heritage and history.However,a group of people presumes country management could invest to attain economic stability rather than spending finance in the field of arts. Even though, the arts is not enthralling,enchanting and beneficial like scientific technology, but still the source of income for many breadwinner and entertaining. Therefore, I disagree with this topic. To begin with, the selection of colors in creating sculpture and developing astounding drawing promotes territory literature which could captivate the people attention across the globe and encourage them to take admission in local institutes in order to learn the arts.In addition, the arts is essential for promoting tourism which may effectively increase country income.For instance,every year a flood of people visit South Asian countries to attend numerous arts exhibitions.Furthermore, message of peace, love and harmony might be conveyed from the art work. Secon
Read more

In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think this is good for a country , while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Do you agree or disagree?

Generally, accumulating money and earning limitless wealth is a dream of   every individual. People after attaining remarkable education deserve high salary and involving country administration in such matters could increase burdens at ruler shoulder.Consequently, I disagree with the topic as I presume that impressive earners pays colossal tax and promotes development of business. To begin with, a business hub appoints intelligent and intellectual people to run their firm effectively. Country income heavily relies on tax paid by the civilian,furthermore, sufficient and considerable cash   flows intensify the purchasing power of an individual. Exchange of money   between businessperson and local civilians could be exceedingly beneficial for country currency value .Moreover, the effect of this substantial activity might also boost the stock exchange. For instance, in Singapore take home salary of people are stupendous,therefore, tax revenue generation of Singapore is relatively hi
Read more