Restricting Air travel is the only way to restrict air pollution. Do you agree?

In the contemporary world, air pollution becomes an ineluctable and intractable issue. Reliable and easily applicable way to control the air contamination is to limit air traffic, but inadequate to control the treacherous increasing impurities in the air. Therefore, I disagree with the topic. However, artificial carbon dioxide absorbing plants, usage of low carbon chain fuel and by controlling expelling of harmful i air pollution from industries.

To begin with, arrival of sophisticated technology in the immediate world enables manufacturers to design flying objects in such a manner that reduce the ejection of deleterious and injurious gases at the nominal level. Furthermore, limiting the air traffic could not exhibits desiring outcomes, recently engineering magazine in South America published that air filters inside the plane expel around 3% of the environmentally unfriendly gases. Moreover, air transportation is the most reliable transport system among all. Presently, goods are transported through air transportation, confining air transportation activities and reduction in flying hours could lead towards enormous financial losses for a  courier industry.

Secondly,the aviation business is at a summit, expansion of the tourist industry propels private investor to invest an extensive amount of monetary assets in the field of aviation, hence hindering and obstructing the usual schedule could cause unacceptable and unimpressive results. Similarly, tourist industry may have a negative impact and tourists feel uncomfortable due to unavailability of flights. For example, flights in Canada were reduced in last winter due to bad weather, but that resulted in  high cost of flight tickets.

To sum up, downsizing of air traffic movement is not a pragmatic decision, but any limitations on such spectacular and phenomenal mode of transportation could deteriorate country frugality .