Some people think that in order to solve the traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs and countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?



Nowadays, a sudden increase in a number of  vehicles on roads produces numerous deleterious issues.A group of individual assumes that some pragmatic measures are enough  to overcome traffic issues, like persuading civilians to live in the main city center rather than conurbation and commuter belt.I disagree , with the topic because a practical implementation of such theory could bring uncountable problems such as poor sewerage system and parking headache.

To begin with,appreciating and educating people to stay within the heart of the city could cause catastrophic effects.In the contemporary world, overcrowding of cities is a major concern, therefore, if people migrate from the remote town and  residential areas to metropolis consequences would be detrimental, in addition, residence in the urban areas  is exorbitant.Basically, transportation complications become intimidating due to inefficient planning and rusty traffic control system. For instance, poor coordination to control traffic in peak hours could cause traffic congestion.

Secondly, in many countries the obsolete and incapable transport system is still working. The government and civic authorities  are not spending ample monetary assets to enhance a standard of transportation. Furthermore, roads and overhead ramp are congested,uncomfortable and rough surface  decrease the flow of cars.Moreover, banking sector propels people to buy cars on easy installment and lifestyle of modern people intensify a person to have their personal transport, consequently, causing annoying traffic. For example, in the South Asian countries, banks are offering  car on long term installment with 1% of interest rate.

 To Sum up, accumulating people like a honey bees in hives is not a sensible measure to vanquish treacherous traffic complications.However, advocating the utilization of public transport instead of private vehicle could solve the matter.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities. To what extent do you agree?

Industries must contribute in promoting local traditions and sports activities by conducting games and public events.In fact, expressing support for local society could bring comprehensive benefits to business groups,therefore, I agree that   gigantic firms must arrange fitness and cultural promoting campaigns. To begin with,   sports is a platform that develop the waves of   jubilation in an individuals and reunite haphazardly relations,in addition, arrangement of sport projects will boost the healthy environment in the society and also become the source of motivation .Furthermore, physical fitness is mandatory for the optimum mental health, actually, physical movements improve the blood flow ,excretes deleterious partials from a person body through the process of sweating.Consequently, prevents the non oxygenated bloods to get further corrupted with harmful viruses. For instance, in events employee families meet with each other, contacts exchange and pleasant conversation led
Read more

Some People think that the Government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Undoubtedly,the arts depict nation culture, traditions, heritage and history.However,a group of people presumes country management could invest to attain economic stability rather than spending finance in the field of arts. Even though, the arts is not enthralling,enchanting and beneficial like scientific technology, but still the source of income for many breadwinner and entertaining. Therefore, I disagree with this topic. To begin with, the selection of colors in creating sculpture and developing astounding drawing promotes territory literature which could captivate the people attention across the globe and encourage them to take admission in local institutes in order to learn the arts.In addition, the arts is essential for promoting tourism which may effectively increase country income.For instance,every year a flood of people visit South Asian countries to attend numerous arts exhibitions.Furthermore, message of peace, love and harmony might be conveyed from the art work. Secon
Read more

In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think this is good for a country , while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Do you agree or disagree?

Generally, accumulating money and earning limitless wealth is a dream of   every individual. People after attaining remarkable education deserve high salary and involving country administration in such matters could increase burdens at ruler shoulder.Consequently, I disagree with the topic as I presume that impressive earners pays colossal tax and promotes development of business. To begin with, a business hub appoints intelligent and intellectual people to run their firm effectively. Country income heavily relies on tax paid by the civilian,furthermore, sufficient and considerable cash   flows intensify the purchasing power of an individual. Exchange of money   between businessperson and local civilians could be exceedingly beneficial for country currency value .Moreover, the effect of this substantial activity might also boost the stock exchange. For instance, in Singapore take home salary of people are stupendous,therefore, tax revenue generation of Singapore is relatively hi
Read more