Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned , while other think people should be free to choose. Discuss both views and give your opinion.




Nowadays, sports industry captivates attention of the youngsters ,therefore, a group of people presumes that any sports which contain deleterious and treacherous moves must be stopped from broadcasting, on the other hand, many individual carry different opinion. In my opinion, sports provide entertainment , authorities must scrutiny the content thoroughly ,but implementing bans on sports might not a reasonable action.

To begin with , in the contemporary world, sport is considered as a optimum source of fascination because adventurous,motivational and enthusiasm material is put on display. Firstly,every sports is a complete business , consequently, provide jobs to innumerable people, shutting down detrimental sports could increase unemployment and  crime rate. Secondly, an athlete career is limited and injury prone,interdicting of an obnoxious sports could limit the career opportunities and increase the competition , which could accelerate disappointment in people  causing psychological issues.For instance,in South America boxing was banned in 1990,but later on banned was lifted because of increase in unemployment.

In contrast , specific sports contaminated with some menacing and intimidating acts , which could fascinates the crowd and viewers, but involve high risk . The inspired followers when practically tried such moves could hurt themselves severely and get perilously close to death.Furthermore, violent sports not cause physical injuries and damages ,but also construct emotions of extremism and violence. For example, recently an extremist attack civilians in  North America,because shooting game propel a culprit to admire ammunition.

 I reckon, every sport involved a  certain degree of risk and aggressive contents,instead of putting ban , a committee would built to monitor the material and theme  each sport production wants to demonstrate.In case, if any sport authority violates define parameters, should be charged with financial penalties.

To sum up , decision of uprooting any atrocious sport may not a pragmatic and sensible decision, because these stops could play a vital role in boosting the economy of a country .

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities. To what extent do you agree?

Some People think that the Government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think this is good for a country , while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Do you agree or disagree?